Its historic and current socialist, soviet, authoritarian, bureaucratic, persecutorial connotations are revolting indeed. Ordinarily, who in his right mind would conceive of using this word or employing any such device?
Inheritance crime in its present primitive juridical state is not an ordinary situation.
With the help of such honest loyal genuine specialists as he may be able to find, the victim heir, addled by criminals including estate managers, co-heirs and his own lawyers, will have gone to considerable pains to forensically and juridically anatomise and assess the situation. He will be weighed down by the criminality's scale, proximity and gravity, and by the imperative urgency of having to stop it.
Now is not the time to equivocate. The deeply disconcerted victim heir must have the immediate undivided attention of an honest, experienced, intelligent, well-intentioned policeman or prosecutor. He senses — MHNA will confirm to him — the absence of a body of police or prosecutors anywhere in the world who know anything about inheritance crime or how to deal with it: just familiar enough with their own dysfunction to pontificate that it must be and remain a 'civil matter'. That is as far as law enforcement typically cares to go with this subject.
We therefore think that in some situations 'denunciation', unquestionably disgusting conceptually, is appropriate to convey with a sense of shock to apathetic, neglectful, incompetent, uninterested, inexperienced, uninformed law enforcement that the victim heir:-
has done his homework in relation to culpable individuals
is not kidding and is not going anywhere
wants law enforcement to deal immediately, properly, fully and timeously with his case.
With nominally responsible authorities to whom it will be unfamiliar, his fully particularised righteous outcry must register as more than a mere complaint.
And if for all its drama an explicitly entitled denunciation still makes no impression on law enforcement, it might (if the client so wishes) impress itself upon the press.
An MHNA formal denunciation to law enforcement of one or more inheritance criminals in a particular case will:-
be in writing signed by the victim heir and at least one inheritance crime specialist
contain a prefatory statement about the precise nature of the instant inheritance crime (we are of course very specific, and never use fashion labels such as 'inheritance theft' or 'inheritance hijacking') and the aptitude in criminal and civil law required to pursue it. We disdain irrelevancies. (If absent from the relevant criminal statute, we consider the point irrelevant. Inheritance — context and or capacity — is relevant only very occasionally to a criminal statute (see eg Fraud Act 2006, s.4(1)(a)). Whether a criminally relevant civil-law duty (see eg Fraud Act 2006, s.3(a)) happens in nature to be general-fiduciary, inheritance-fiduciary and or something else is almost always irrelevant: law enforcement almost never requires any familiarity with the fiduciariness of any relevant duty)
recite and pellucidate applicable criminal and civil law and practice in the relevant jurisdiction(s)
contain a complete log, ledger, diary and archive of all relevant documents, plus appropriate formal witness statements
contain a detailed forensic and legal report comprising exposition, dissection, examination, analysis, comparative analysis, evaluation and valuation, with graphics, charts, flowcharts, timelines, relationship charts, primary accounts, shadow accounts and draft indictments.
To the point of spoon-feeding law enforcement, MHNA will set out the facts and the law on a plate.