MHNA Consulting LLC provides a comprehensive range of specialist inheritance crime-fighting services to heirs, lawyers, law enforcement and others worldwide. We handle multi-million-dollar multi-jurisdiction inheritance crime cases, and are also equipped for smaller cases.

We are open for business to anyone (in principle), in any jurisdiction (the subject is generic and universal), concerned personally and or professionally in fighting inheritance crime.

If you're serious about inheritance crime, MHNA can handle it for you. With MHNA on the case, participants on all sides of an inheritance crime scene will quickly catch on that a genuine, conscientious, diligent, loyal and relentless crime-fighting operation is in place oriented to prosecution, not litigation.

This no-frills no-gimmicks website describes our approach in detail. We hope it strikes you as empassioned.

An ancient vice of universal concern, inheritance crime is a major under-reported, under-done menace:-

We've seen estimates quantifying baby boomer assets just in the USA at ~$100 trillion ($100,000,000,000,000 — to be testamentarily distributed mostly by devolution, not dispersal)
We guestimate conservatively that 0.1% of that — $100,000,000,000 — will be lost to before- and after-death inheritance crime perpetrated by heirs, lawyers and estate managers, among others.

MHNA sees all relevant inheritance-related dysfunction as actually or potentially criminal.

MHNA's particular line is the uncovering and criminalising of inheritance crime. MHNA identifies, investigates, examines, analyses, assesses, evaluates, gross- and net-values, elucidates, exposes and pursues inheritance crime using the criminal justice system.

MHNA also assists on the civil side. We are of course wholly opposed to civil lawyers and law enforcement misleading victims of inheritance crime into using the civil justice system as if the criminal justice system did not exist. We do not wish to see victim heirs wasting their lives courting a Jarndyce-style chance'ry division of their inheritance in relation to inheritance crime that can and should be prosecuted.

We have no idea why this should be difficult. We can explain why it is difficult. The situation takes a bit of unravelling. (We venture to suggest that the whole subject is a bit of a mess; and this doesn't take into account the unknowns of the criminal trial even when you've mastered both the subject and the case.)

Most fundamentally, MHNA's determination to thrust inheritance crime into the criminal justice system comes up against resistance from the four communities principally involved. Each community behaves dysfunctionally.

In soliciting victim heir customers, civil lawyers selling civil law services commit a multitude of false representations concerning themselves, their practices, civil and criminal law and practice, etc.

In rebuffing complainant victims, law enforcement commit a multitude of false representations concerning themselves. their expertise, the scope of their jobs, civil and criminal law etc. in order to evade practising criminal law.

The victim heir is in the middle. Confusing, ain't it?

Two simple rules before we start.

1: If you're a victim heir, and a lawyer hooks you with 'inheritance theft', 'inheritance hijacking' and similar insinuations of crime, that lawyer is representing that:-

he is a criminal lawyer
those specific offenses exist (misleading shorthand is not allowed in this business)
he is a specialist in investigating and prosecuting them
he is definitely not going to litigate them unless they are statutorily explicitly hybrid (can be prosecuted and or litigated).

In that case, expect and demand prosecution, not litigation, or you're going to get sucked into multiply confusing 'probate' litigation that has nothing to do with prosecution:-

suing for conversion, deceit, trespass to goods, breach of trust, breach of fiduciary duty, civil fraud etc etc. is never prosecution of theft or anything else, including any fantasy or real offense of 'inheritance theft' or any other theft, even if the relevant statute explicitly says that any relevant theft can be litigated as well as prosecuted and under exactly what circumstances, including the genuinely fully informed victim's freedom to choose prosecution and or litigation, and even if the civil lawyer claims — always falsely — that that proposed or actual litigation is litigation of any fantasy or real offense of theft: suing for conversion, trespass to goods or any other tort is never suing for hybrid theft
beware the civil lawyer who complains, in credibility-destroying pre-litigation correspondence with the opposition, of 'inheritance theft' if there is no such offense and the lawyer is not litigating or prosecuting theft
demand to see the statutes creating the offense of 'inheritance theft' and 'inheritance hijacking'
demand to see the provisions in the relevant statutes making the relevant offenses actionable. (And of course do deep due diligence on everything else about that lawyer's track record of getting convictions in inheritance crime etc.)

MHNA educates victim heirs on the elementary differences between criminal and civil law, and the tricks of the civil practice trade in confusing the two:-

It is impossible to litigate theft unless relevant law explicitly permits it
even in that infinitely rare circumstance there's a process involved in the victim heir making a genuinely fully informed choice of course(s) of action and lawyers etc.

We educate civil lawyers on how to not confuse and mislead potential and actual customers about criminal and civil law and practice, and how to deal with inheritance crime as crime (meaning prosecution, never litigation unless the offense is statutorily hybrid and the necessary processes are undergone).

2: If law enforcement dismiss your assertions of inheritance crime with "It's a civil matter", don't be cowed but keep going all the way up to the top in every relevant office in every relevant location in every relevant jurisdiction until you find a genuine specialist in inheritance crime with the intelligence, patience, integrity, loyalty and guts to deal with your assertions honestly, diligently, conscientiously, expeditiously, efficiently and competently. MHNA's services to victim heirs include finding this law enforcement person for you and advocating your case to him unanswerably. We also deal with private prosecution lawyers who might not get the finer points of undetectable plain-view inheritance crime.

More precisely (we largely have in mind the American situation but this has wider application), with no apologies for repetition (this is an important subject culpably misstated and badly misunderstood; setting it out laboriously is appropriate):-

Civil lawyers:-

generally favor civil law and practice
especially like probate court 'probate litigation' (which often has nothing to do with probate), and chance'ry litigation: it pays better than prosecuting (if we're in a jurisdiction in which the civil lawyer or his firm can do that directly or indirectly)
give victim heirs the false impression that torts are the same as crimes
don't give the uninformed victim heir holistic information or advice about the most elementary fundamentals of the civil and criminal justice systems (they are separate, must be considered separately, are never synonymous and almost never overlap), or any directly or indirectly relevant criminal-law contacts
have little or no expertise or experience in criminal law practice and for all their advertised implicit prowess specifically in invented crime and invented hybrid crime and invented actionable hybrid crime are not inclined to diversify into it, including the invented hybrid crimes featured in their own advertising
invent crimes. The insinuation in your advertising is that 'inheritance theft' is a crime. By what law, exactly? Ditto 'inheritance hijacking'. What is 'inheritance hijacking' exactly, and what law criminalises it?
invent hybrid crimes. A civil lawyer advertising his prowess in handling by civil means the (invented) criminal offense of 'inheritance theft' is insinuating that that specific offense not only exists (unless it exists, it doesn't exist) but can and positively should be dealt with — even though a (hybrid) crime, perhaps dealt with only — civilly (not unless the offense exists and the criminalising law says that it's not criminal). Except in the case of a statutorily expressly hybrid offense that does exist, whoever heard of suing anyone for theft?
represent that it is appropriate to not prosecute a non-existent offense that is also a non-existent hybrid offense but to sue on it
represent to the multiple victim — of inheritance crime and now the civil lawyer's misconduct, with more to come —that they will sue on a non-existent offense that is also a non-existent hybrid offense. How exactly do you propose doing that?
misrepresent their practice and intentions. You know, but your mark does not know, that your practice does not extend to either prosecuting or litigating any crime, real or invented, hybrid or not. Maybe you'll eventually confess that what you're doing or proposing to do has absolutely nothing to do with any crime, criminality or criminal law process — that you propose to deal with this invented crime and its invented hybridness not by prosecuting or litigating it but only by using as yet undisclosed not-criminal not-hybrid civil law (conversion, deceit, trespass to goods, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of trust, civil fraud etc.): "It's called something else technically, and it has nothing to do with any crime, and it's all civil, and the policeman was absolutely right about it all being a civil matter, but for us it's really inheritance theft, I assure you." Or you might choose to never disclose to him the exact not-criminal not-hybrid cause(s) of action. Maybe you'll let him go on thinking that you are indeed suing on a fabricated-hybrid fabricated crime called 'inheritance theft'. Which is it, so far? (Five or six deceptions so far on the victim heir by his own lawyer, in addition to the inheritance crime, with lots more to come because everyone is now in a hole.)

Prosecution-side criminal lawyers:-

don't know enough about relevant inheritance-related factual events, incidents, episodes and sagas to be credible or effective in cases of intricate multi-jurisdictional multi-succession multi-million-dollar inheritance crime, especially when being committed in plain view right under your nose but undetectable unless you know exactly what you're looking at (especially true of inheritance crime by estate managers and their lawyers, and by the victim heir's own lawyers). Inheritance is not an ingredient in a particular crime unless the criminalising statute explicitly says otherwise. But inheritance facts are very relevant to how, when, where, by whom and against whom a relevant crime is committed. You risk missing them every time
will tend to miss inheritance criminality's relevant civil law: we are not saying that civil law is irrelevant. Criminally obtaining, retaining, invoking and purporting to exercise a court appointment as estate manager, for example
knowing that they are not fully equipped intellectually, will take the case or decline it. How does this dysfunction assist the victim heir?

Victim heirs:-

don't understand the most elementary differences between prosecuting and suing, between crimes and actionable misconduct, or between the civil and criminal justice systems generally and how they (don't) interact
labour under the false impression that litigation of a tort is the same as or equivalent to prosecution of a crime
are systematically misinformed about both the civil and the criminal systems by both civil lawyers and law enforcement, each dragooning the victim away from the criminal system by claiming, each for their own improper reasons, that patently obvious genuine real inheritance crime (averred one way or another by the civil lawyer in his advertising, disavowed by law enforcement when deigning to talk to the victim complaint) is not criminal, or cannot or should not be prosecuted
think that there is such a crime as 'inheritance theft' and 'inheritance hijacking' and that they are actionable and must be dealt with in the civil system, not in the criminal system
are particularly dismayed and disoriented by civil lawyers' unexplained, deliberate, confusingly incongruous, irrelevant marketing averments of multiply irrelevant imaginary hybrid and not-hybrid criminality: the civil lawyer invents the law… 
are particularly dismayed and disoriented by law enforcement's unexplained, deliberate, confusingly incongruous, irrelevant marketing averments of concocted multiply irrelevant hybrid or not-hybrid actionability: law enforcement invent the law…
don't bother to inform themselves of their concurrent, consecutive and alternative civil and criminal process options
are not intellectually capable of constructing or presenting an irresistible irrefutable brief for law enforcement
are uninformed, misinformed, bewildered, cowed and dumbfounded comprehensively to the point of being unable to make rational decisions and unfit to manage their own affairs
are likely to end up in civil court — highly gratifyingly to both opportunist civil lawyers and dysopportunist law enforcement, neither of whom wants the criminal case
are certainly in for what they do deserve: not their inheritance but a big bill from the civil lawyer
maybe do understand that by going to a civil lawyer, especially in a jurisdiction where private prosecutions are not known and where law enforcement has already given him the heave-ho, he's in for litigation, not prosecution. Maybe it really is clear to you that 'inheritance theft' is the civil lawyer's improper, inappropriate, unprofessional, misleading, deliberately confusing euphemism for a bunch of torts and that you'll never see the right side of the inside of a criminal court, and that all of that is just swell. MHNA begs to suggest that such moral and intellectual dysfunction is not the correct way to go to law (and anyway we're off to criminal court so none of this really matters).

Police and public prosecutors (private prosecutors are motivated entirely differently) have their own explaining to do:-

there's no culture of treating or even recognising intricate inheritance crime as either crime or criminal. You're supposed to treat this particular species of crime as criminal, go after it and prosecute the criminals, especially lawyers
there's no specialty of doing any of that. You're supposed to meet the relevant standard of specialist professional competence specifically in the field of inheritance crime
you have a thing about making trenchant dishonest grandiose irrelevant pronouncements of irrelevant expertise (which you have invented) in irrelevant law that doesn't exist and irrelevant civil process that doesn't exist. "It's a civil matter" — concerning the same misconduct that the civil lawyer avers is criminal 'inheritance theft', possibly hybrid — is not only irrelevant, inaccurate, disingenuous, discourteous and dishonest (however much it gets you off the hook and assists civil lawyers). It annoys us and distresses the victim heir. You declare and or opine that patently obvious genuine real criminality is not crime at all (cf. the civil lawyer's invention of crime that really isn't crime) and can only be dealt with civilly, or that it is a peculiar type of hybrid crime that can, should and must be dealt with only civilly. All this is monstrous. We'd be pleased if you would do your job, without pretense, invention or evasion, in a way that squares with your sworn public duty. No more "It's a civil matter" when presented with genuine inheritance crime.

Inheritance crime is close to the perfect crime because:-

the subject, for all its antediluvian antiquity and ubiquity, is in its fundamentals still badly misunderstood, badly explained and badly mishandled
perpetrators, especially lawyers (as such and as estate managers) and other stiff-collar criminals, know how to comprehensively exploit the phony complexity of an inheritance situation (there's no such thing as a complex inheritance situation) and its open invitations to easily committed multi-dimensional multiple comprehensive chronic criminality perpetrated in plain view
neglectful, emotional, distressed, confused, uninformed, incoherent, despondent, grandiose victims let it happen and then do nothing about it
specialist chance'ry lawyers, knowing nothing relevant about criminal law or practice, dragoon their now multiply victimised victims in the direction of expensive, speculative, potentially dangerous chance'ry litigation, which is usually multiply comprehensively inappropriate. No criminal process. It might as well not exist as crime
police and prosecutors (by which we almost always mean public prosecutors):-

- fail from ignorance and laziness to understand the simple, ordinary dynamics and context of inheritance crime — it's all simple ordinary plain-vanilla crime, comprehensively covered by simple ordinary criminal law, committed in the context of inheritance
- are easily confused and intimidated by the inheritance context, which they clearly know little or nothing about. We suspect that criminal investigations of inheritance crime, when they do happen, are cumbersome, ungainly, inelegant and protracted because law enforcement does not know enough about inheritance or inheritance crime, simple or intricate, to do any better. Any other reason?
- do not lack for pretentiousness, presumption and bad faith. Knowing nothing relevant about civil law or practice, knowing less about inheritance law and practice and knowing nothing about the case (except that they don't want it), "It's a civil matter" is an all-too-familiar inappropriate, unfounded, meaningless, irrelevant, reprehensible edict, just because they see an actual or potential civil law connection. Law enforcement are rightly despised for this racket. We are generally not interested in anything any police or prosecutor has to say at any time for any reason about any civil law or practice, whatever their actual or fancied pre-eminence as civil lawyers, however expert in imaginary hybrid offenses, and however clairvoyant about a case they know nothing about. Crime and criminal law must be the starting points.

Generally speaking:-

a crime is never actionable (we make no apologies for a purist approach to law and terminology)
an inheritance (or any other) crime as such is never 'a civil matter' (that accursed phrase beloved of so-called law enforcement), or also 'a civil matter', unless the relevant crime statute expressly says so. Out of hundreds of relevant crime statutes globally that we've reviewed, we've only ever seen two crimes — in US states — statutorily justiciable in both criminal and civil court (and neither concerns inheritance)
there's almost no specific criminal law about it. There doesn't need to be: ordinary plain-vanilla criminal law already covers it
inheritance crime is ordinary plain-vanilla crime committed in the context of inheritance
there's no such crime as 'inheritance theft' or 'inheritance hijacking'
there's no specialty among lawyers or law enforcement of inheritance crime. There does need to be. Criminal lawyers do need to be intimately acquainted with all relevant (and some irrelevant) procedural, substantive, financial, legal, technical and practical aspects of the crime scene in full context: what are the jurisdictional issues; who are the principal and accessory perpetrators and how do they work individually, in combination and collectively (including what they are supposed to be doing and not doing in civil law, if that's relevant to criminality, which it usually won't be); exactly what ordinary plain-vanilla and other criminality do they commit (including its concealment) and how, when, where and in relation to what do they do it; who are the victims; what assets, liabilities, business, situations, issues, activities, relationships and transactions in which locations (inner office, back office, front office, recourse, etc.) are the subject and object of what criminality; what points and issues, especially those raised in purported self-exculpation by the perpetrators, are relevant and irrelevant; where the perpetrators are lawyers, judges and relevant officials, what are the peculiar ways and circumstances in which they conceive, carry out, accomplish and attempt to consummate their criminality
there's nothing inherently difficult about committing, identifying, investigating, examining, evaluating, valuing, expounding, elucidating, exposing or pursuing inheritance crime.

more summary

Before- and after-death testamentary assets fall into the hands not only of criminal heirs but of an entire ecosystem of parasitic predators including lawyers (especially lawyers) and professional estate fiduciaries (mainly lawyers). And 'theft' is simplistic. The range of intra- and inter-jurisdictional, multi-dimensional, multi-layer, multi-stage, multi-party criminality that can envelope just one testator and one estate is encyclopedic: theft, criminal non-disclosure, criminal misrepresentation, criminal abuse of position, criminal accounting, money laundering, asset laundering, activity laundering, assault, kidnapping, impersonation, murder, forgery, obstructing justice, perjury…

MHNA is familiar with all this from real cases. A few favorite inheritance crime situations from our files:-

multiple 'expert' lawyers in multiple jurisdictions giving patently bad advice to the criminal standard
'leave everything to me' solicitous elder abuse including coercion to make lifetime gifts, new will, codicils, etc. + contemporaneous theft (art, furniture, cash)

elaborate, brazen, flagrant inheritance crime hidden conspicuously in the plain site of 'experts'
committed by organised criminals, especially gangs of lawyers, gangs of heirs and hybrid gangs
criminal cash, asset and activity washing, rinsing, bleaching, drying, ironing, starching etc. involving estate managers, power-attorneys, trusted insiders, lawyers, auction houses, corrupt private buyers, corrupt bankers, corrupt tax officials, corrupt police, corrupt judges, etc.
committed by estate manager criminals and their lawyers in criminal imaginary estate management
committed against high-value, intricate, vulnerable estates with complex factual and legal international and multi-jurisdictional dynamics
a Cambridge college — specifically, one or more of its employees specialising in soliciting and administering legacies — sits on a substantial legacy from an alumnus for more than sixteen years, doing nothing to honor it, lies in plain view about it, and then instructs (with whose money, knowledge and approval?) a firm of notoriously venal belligerent lawyers to write a comprehensively idiotic letter — this is not idiocy just from the law firm but specifically from the already dishonest customer college — to the incredulous concerned residuary heir that it will get round to doing something (unspecified) 'in the coming months' (there's nothing honest about any of this)
inherent and exherent duty-interest conflict crime (criminal evidence tampering a specialty)
sagely pronounced by 'expert' lawyers to be 'unprecedented', 'interesting', 'too difficult', etc.
criminal numbers: books of account, draft and final financial statements, tax filings etc. We are deeply concerned about accounting, accounts, accountants, auditing, audits, auditors and others in relation to interim and final draft and final estate manager financial statements prepared for the inner office, the back office, the front office, tax authorities etc.
criminal imaginary estate front-office litigation by the estate manager criminal and her lawyer accomplices against co-criminal front-office opponents: phoney claims, data criminality, brazen dishonesty to the court, 'eye-watering' criminal billing, etc. (and criminal chance'ry judges and costs judges)
committed by a succession of the victim heir's own multiply dishonest specialist saboteur lawyers colluding with heirs and the criminal estate manager and her gangs
sabotage of the testator's unfinished front-office business by the estate manager criminal in collusion with front-office opponents and others.

This barely scratches the surface of a vast subject.

MHNA is on top of it.

In preparation:-

INHERITANCE CRIME: A MANUAL FOR HEIRS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT

Hard copy and ebook. With dedicated podcast, webinars, videos, enewsletter, alternative ethics courses, networking. For testators, their families, friends, lawyers, advisers; expectant proto-heirs; heirs-in-waiting; heirs; lawyers, accountants, law enforcement, regulators, journalists, researchers, judges etc. The full range of pre-death and post-death criminality in relation to inheritance. For more details, see this book's webpage at Anatexis.Media.

ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING IN INHERITANCE CRIME

Hard copy and ebook. With dedicated webinars with guest contributors. For testators, heirs, clerks, bookkeepers, in-house and outside accountants, forensic fiduciary accountants, forensic fiduciary and general auditors, tax authorities, law enforcement, judges, estate fiduciaries, lawyers etc. Comprehensive consideration of pre-death and post-death authentic and fabricated numbers; logs, ledgers, archives, primary source material, underlying data, books of account, sets of accounts, draft and final accounts, tax filings, court filings, shadow data, data handling, forensic approaches etc. For more details, see this book's webpage at Anatexis.Media.

Google Sites

Report abuse